Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Humphrys (Tobin) v Chief Executive Officer of Department of Communities WA [2021] FCA 586 File number: WAD 62 of 2021
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - jurisdiction in defamation proceedings - where applicant claims statements made by employees of department of respondent are defamatory - where statements claimed to be published in reports submitted to State Administrative Tribunal of Western Australia - where statements claimed to be published in emails between employees - where statements claimed to be published in reasons of State Administrative Tribunal - whether publication occurred outside Western Australia - whether assertion of publication outside Western Australia colourable COSTS - consideration of costs where counsel is employee working for the respondent
Legislation: State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA) s 163
Cases cited: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29 Crosby v Kelly [2012] FCAFC 96; (2012) 203 FCR 451 Ernst & Young (Reg) v Tynski Pty Limited [2003] FCAFC 233 Henderson Borough Council v Auckland Regional Authority [1984] 1 NZLR 16 Marsh v Baxter [No 2] [2016] WASCA 51 Noye v Robbins [2010] WASCA 83 Oliver v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 583 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC 156; (2017) 254 FCR 1
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate