Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ferdinands v Registrar Cridland [2021] FCA 592 File number: SAD 166 of 2020
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 4 June 2021
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — application for judicial review of a Registrar's decision under r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to reject documents for filing — whether the original application and accompanying documents are frivolous and vexatious — application dismissed.
Legislation: Australian Constitution s 51 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 53, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AM Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26, 36.01 Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA) ss 31, 32, 33, 35, 44, 73 Police Act 1998 (SA) s 42
Cases cited: Bizuneh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 42; (2003) 128 FCR 353 Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2020] FCA 1675 Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2020] FCA 1676 Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2021] FCA 24 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61; (1972) 127 CLR 421 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 Nyoni v Murphy [2018] FCAFC 75; (2018) 261 FCR 164 Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation [2020] FCA 808 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC 156; (2017) 254 FCR 1 Swee Yen Tay v Migration Review Tribunal [2009] FCA 515; (2009) 178 FCR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate