Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
ABW17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] FCA 596 Appeal from: ABW17 v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2019] FCCA 864
File number: VID 379 of 2019
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether the Federal Circuit Court of Australia erred in failing to find jurisdictional error in the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – whether the Tribunal failed to give genuine, proper and realistic consideration to an integer of claim – whether the Tribunal erred in applying s 5J(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 5J(3)
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of hearing: 31 May 2021
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms J Zhou
Solicitor for the Appellant: Vstar Lawyers and Consultants
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr A Cunynghame of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 379 of 2019
BETWEEN: ABW17 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
order made by: BROMBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 31 May 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The Appellant pay the First Respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or as assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate