Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
YVTG by his Litigation Representative AKI21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 655 Appeal from: Application for review of a migration decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 17 May 2019
File number: VID 723 of 2019
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 18 June 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – cancellation of a visa on character grounds – where the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision not to revoke cancellation – application for judicial review of Tribunal's decision – whether Tribunal took account of relevant considerations – whether Tribunal's decision was legally unreasonable – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application not commenced within time prescribed by statute – whether extension should be granted – extension granted
Legislation: 1 Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 (Vic) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – ss 476, 477A, 500, 501 and 501CA
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352, 364 DLJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1650 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha (2018) 267 FCR 643, 654 Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 155
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate