Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wilson Transformer Company Pty Ltd v Anti-dumping Review Panel (No 3) [2021] FCA 672 File number(s): VID 409 of 2020
Judgment of: KERR J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – application for the Applicant to pay the costs of the Second and Third Respondents following judgment in Wilson Transformer Company Pty Ltd v Anti-dumping Review Panel (No 2) [2021] FCA 591 – there be no order for the Applicant to pay the costs of the Second and Third Respondents – the Applicant to pay only the costs of the First Respondent
Legislation: Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: AIT18 v Australian Information Commissioner [2018] FCAFC 192; 267 FCR 93 George v Fletcher (Trustee) (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 71 Huon Aquaculture Group Limited v Minister for the Environment (No 2) [2018] FCA 1938 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman [1980] HCA 13; 144 CLR 13 Wilson Transformer Company Pty Ltd v Anti-dumping Review Panel (No 2) [2021] FCA 591
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 19
Date of last submission/s: 21 June 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate