Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Shaw (Liquidator) v GO2 Recruitment Pty Ltd, in the matter of VCS Civil and Mining Pty Limited (in liq) [2021] FCA 681 File number(s): NSD 79 of 2021
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to join several defendants to 'mothership' or 'mother' proceedings commenced irregularly – requirements of r 9.02 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) have not been satisfied – the Plaintiffs claim relief in respect of alleged unfair preference payments made to multiple defendants, with the circumstances relating to such payments being unique to each defendant – proceedings commenced immediately prior to the expiration of the limitation period – whether proceedings may be cured by a declaration under s 51 of the Federal Court of Australia 1976 (Cth) - whether leave ought to be granted to dispense with the requirement to comply with r 9.02(b) - application successful
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 51(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 1.34, 9.02(b)
Cases cited: Caason Investments Pty Ltd v Cao [2015] FCAFC 94; (2015) 236 FCR 322 Dudley (Liquidator) v RHG Construction Fitout & Maintenance Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1355 Dudley (Liquidator) v RHG Construction Fitout & Maintenance Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1723 Jahani (liquidator) v Alfabs Mining Equipment Pty Ltd, in the matter of Delta Coal Mining Pty Limited (in liq) [2020] FCA 752 Johnston v Vintage Developments Pty Limited [2006] FCAFC 171
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate