Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BCT18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 695 Appeal from: BCT18 & Ors v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2020] FCCA 1542
File number: SAD 103 of 2020
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 28 June 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – decision to refuse applications for Safe Haven Enterprise visas affirmed by Immigration Assessment Authority – appeal from dismissal of application for judicial review of Authority's decision – whether primary judge erred in concluding that the Authority had not failed to consider an integer of first appellant's claims concerning his profile as a non-rehabilitated former combatant with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam – no appealable error established PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to adduce arguments alleging jurisdictional error on the part of the Authority not raised at first instance – appellants legally represented in judicial review proceedings by different lawyers – inadequate explanation for failure to raise grounds at first instance – leave refused
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 36, 65, 474, 476A, 486I
Cases cited: AAD16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1433 AAM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 231 FCR 452 AOL15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 979 BCT18 & Ors v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2020] FCCA 1542 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 268 FCR 362 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 Raibevu v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 35 SZTOX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 77
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate