Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd v Whittaker (No 2) [2021] FCA 696 File number: NSD 380 of 2020
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 25 June 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - applications for discovery - where parties seek orders for discovery by categories - whether categories sought directly relevant to issues raised in pleadings - whether appropriate for orders to mask parts of documents for relevance
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.11, 20.13
Cases cited: Adelaide Brighton Cement Limited, in the matter of Concrete Supply Pty Ltd v Concrete Supply Pty Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (No 3) [2018] FCA 1058 Babscay Pty Ltd v Pitcher Partners (a firm) [2019] FCA 480 Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Price Waterhouse (1996) 68 SASR 19 Esso Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Workers Union (No 3) [2020] FCA 316 Evans v Davantage Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 473 Gall v Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited [2019] FCA 1799 West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd v Total UK Ltd [2008] EWHC 1296 (Comm)
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate