Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lansen on behalf of the Guyal Manaburru, Burdal Mingkanyi, Burdal Riley, Murrungun Wunubari, Murrungun Baluganda/Langgabany, Mambali Walangara, Mambali Ngubayin and Mambali Nangguya Estate Groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2021] FCA 718 File number: NTD 43 of 2017
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2021
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – agreement of all parties – determination of native title by consent.
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 55, 56, 61, 66, 87, 87A, 94A, 223, 225 Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976
Cases cited: Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 1386; (2011) 285 ALR 454 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; (2002) 214 CLR 422 Nelson v Northern Territory of Australia [2010] FCA 1343; (2010) 190 FCR 344 Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404 Smith v Western Australia [2000] FCA 1249; (2000) 104 FCR 494
Division: General Division
Registry: Northern Territory
National Practice Area: Native Title
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate