Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tregidga v Pasma Holdings Pty Limited [2021] FCA 721 File number: NSD 1803 of 2017
Judgment of: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 28 June 2021
Catchwords: ADMIRALTY – where applicants made claim for damages against maritime electrical contractor arising from fire on board vessel – whether there was a breach of contract or breach of statutory guarantee or negligence with regard to the fire – whether respondent was liable for damage caused to vessel – whether applicants were owners of the vessel at the time of fire – whether applicants were parties to contracts relating to the electrical works conducted on the vessel – whether applicants were "consumers" for the purposes of s 60 of the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (the ACL) – whether the applicants were entitled to pursue a claim against the respondents under s 60 of the ACL without being parties to the contract – whether duty of care in tort was owed to the applicants by the respondent – whether scope of the duty of care owed by the respondent extended to taking steps to prevent fire – whether scope of duty of care affected by terms of contracts – whether there was a breach of duty of care – determination of causation – application dismissed
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) Shipping Registration Act 1981 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Air Tahiti Nui Pty Ltd v McKenzie (2009) 77 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCA 429 Alameddine v Glenworth Valley Horse Riding Pty Ltd (2015) 324 ALR 355; [2015] NSWCA 219 BH Australia Constructions Pty Ltd v Kapeller (2019) 100 NSWLR 367; [2019] NSWSC 108 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Council of the Shire of Sutherland v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 Council of the Shire of Wyong v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Tomko v Palasty [2007] NSWCA 258 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Limited v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540; [2002] HCA 54 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Lederberger v Mediterranean Olives Financial Pty Ltd (2012) 38 VR 509; [2012] VSCA 262 Lets Go Adventures Pty Ltd v Barrett [2017] NSWCA 243 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180; [1999] HCA 36 Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330; [2007] HCA 42 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Limited (2000) 200 CLR 121; [2000] HCA 18 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562; [2001] HCA 59 Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2017) 258 FCR 190; [2017] FCAFC 224 Voli v Inglewood Shire Council (1963) 110 CLR 74 Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Company Limited (1956) 95 CLR 43 Woods v Multi-Support Holdings Pty Limited (2002) 208 CLR 460; [2002] HCA 9
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate