Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Amir v Director of Professional Services Review [2021] FCA 745 File number(s): NSD 865 of 2020
Judgment of: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 July 2021
Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – when decision is made – decision must be manifested, irrevocable and final to constitute decision – whether earlier decision is operative for purposes of statute – application for review dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 36(1), 36(2) Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) ss 79A, 82, 86(1), 86(2), 87, 88A(1), 88A(2), 88A(3), 88A(4), 88A(5), 88A(7), 89B, 89C(1), 89C(2), 91(1), 91(2), 92(1), 93(1), 93(7), 94(1), 94(3), 131
Cases cited: Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; (1774) 98 ER 969 ConnectEast Management Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 22 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQOY [2012] FCAFC 131; (2012) 206 FCR 25 Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship v SZRNY [2013] FCAFC 104; (2013) 214 FCR 374 National Home Doctor Service Pty Ltd v Director of Professional Services Review [2020] FCA 1016; (2020) 276 FCR 382 Semunigus v The Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 422 Semunigus v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 240; (2000) 96 FCR 533
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate