Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment (No 2) [2021] FCA 774 File number: VID 607 of 2020
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 8 July 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – Whether applicants' failure to fully obtain the relief claimed justifies an order apportioning the applicants' costs. DECLARATIONS – Whether declaration describing the duty of care owed by the respondent utile – whether content of duty of care should be formulated by reference to the genus of the risk of harm or by reference to particular manifestations thereof. REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – Rule 9.21(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether proceeding should not continue as a representative proceeding – whether representative proceeding should be discontinued because of risk of prejudice to represented persons by operation of res judicata.
Legislation: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) ss 130, 133 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.32, 9.21, 9.22, Div 9.2 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) r 13(1)
Cases cited: Carnie v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (1995) 182 CLR 398 Cruse v Multiplex Ltd (2008) 172 FCR 279 Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru (No 2) (2015) 90 ALJR 270; [2015] HCA 53 Fuchs Lubricants (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Quaker Chemical (Australasia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 114 Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council [2000] 1 WLR 1082 Kerrison v Melbourne City Council (2014) 228 FCR 87 Mount Isa Mines Ltd v Pusey (1970) 125 CLR 383 Muldoon v Melbourne City Council (2013) 217 FCR 450 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319 Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd v Takeovers Panel (No 2) (2015) 236 FCR 370 Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330 Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Quarry Mining & Construction Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 158 Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560 Stuart v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2010) 185 FCR 308 Zhang v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 45 FCR 384
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate