Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BJM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] FCA 786 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: BJM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 894
File number: WAD 93 of 2021
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 12 July 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION - application for extension of time to appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court - application for urgent injunction to restrain removal - where claim to injunctive relief dependent on merits of application for extension of time - where Federal Circuit Court dismissed application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal - where Tribunal affirmed decision of delegate of Minister to refuse protection visa - where delay of three years in applying for extension - where applicant claims fear to harm on basis of adverse encounter whilst working in nightclub - where Tribunal found photographs of applicant in nightclub not corroborative of applicant's account that he worked in nightclub - where applicant seeks to advance appeal ground not raised before primary judge - where leave required to adduce further evidence in appeal - whether proposed appeal ground demonstrated to have reasonable prospects of success - application for extension of time dismissed - application for injunctive relief dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 198, 477, 477A
Cases cited: ARK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 825 BQQ15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218 Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; (2008) 238 CLR 218 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 46; (2019) 268 FCR 362 CGQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; (2016) 253 FCR 496 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 CZA19 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2021] FCAFC 57 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; (2018) 258 FCR 175 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 Fualau v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 11 Han v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 331 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen, Minister for Home Affairs and Environment (1984) 3 FCR 344 Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 929 Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1391; (2015) 242 FCR 585 MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 110 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 Northern Land Council v Quall (No 3) [2021] FCAFC 2 NWQR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 30 Parker v The Queen [2002] FCAFC 133 Re Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Defence); Ex parte Marks [2000] HCA 67 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 52; (2016) 243 FCR 220 Vu v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 90; (2020) 276 FCR 516 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; (2004) 238 FCR 588 WQRJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 736
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate