Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Donoghue v Russells (A Firm) [2021] FCA 798 Appeal from: Russells (A Firm) v Donoghue [2019] FCCA 1864
File number: QUD 446 of 2019
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 16 July 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – appeal against judgment of Federal Circuit Court of Australia – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – where primary judge made sequestration order against debtor – whether primary judge erred in finding that debtor "was carrying on business in Australia" under s 43(1)(b)(iii) – whether primary judge erred in finding that debtor "had a place of business in Australia" under s 43(1)(b)(ii) – whether servicing a debt in Australia constitutes "carrying on business in Australia" – whether Jones v Dunkel inference properly drawn where debtor failed to give evidence on source of funds used for loan repayments – whether debtor's address for a company directorship grounds an inference of the debtor having a "place of business in Australia" – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 43(1) and 52(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 21(2) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140(2) Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) s 5B(3)(b) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 10.42, 10.43 Local Government Act 1919 (NSW) s 118 Bankruptcy Act 1914 (UK) s 1(2) Rules of the Supreme Court 1883 (UK) Ord IX, r 8
Cases cited: Actiesselskabet Dampskib "Hercules" v Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Company [1912] 1 KB 222 Ahern v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Qld) (1987) 76 ALR 137 ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345 Australian Information Commissioner v Facebook Inc (No 2) [2020] FCA 1307 Badcock v Cumberland Gap Park Company [1893] 1 Ch 362 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 64 Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2002) 118 FCR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466 Fuller v Alford (2017) 252 FCR 168 G v H (1994) 181 CLR 387 Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell (1982) 149 CLR 155 Haggin v Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1889) 23 QBD 519 Hamilton v Warne (1907) 4 CLR 1293 Henderson v State of Queensland (2014) 255 CLR 1 HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1 In re Bird v Inland Revenue Commissioners; Ex parte the Debtor [1962] 1 WLR 686 In re Brauch (A Debtor); Ex parte Britannic Securities and Investments Ltd [1978] Ch 316 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361 Napiat Pty Ltd v Salfinger (No 7) (2011) 202 FCR 264 Newby v Von Oppen and The Colt's Patent Firearms Manufacturing Company (1872) LR 7 QB 293 Re Application of Campbell; Gebo Investments (Labuan) Ltd v Signatory Investments Pty Ltd (2005) 54 ACSR 111 Re Mendonca; Ex parte Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 1 ATR 571 Re TCL Airconditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Castel Electronics Pty Ltd (No 2) (2019) 369 ALR 192 Re Vassis; Ex Parte Leung (1986) 9 FCR 518 Russells (A Firm) v Donoghue [2019] FCCA 1864 Smith (on behalf of National Parks and Wildlife Service) v Capewell (1979) 142 CLR 509 South India Shipping Corporation Ltd v Export-Import Bank of Korea [1985] 1 WLR 585 Theophile v The Solicitor‐General [1950] AC 186 Tiger Yacht Management Ltd v Morris (2019) 268 FCR 548 Trustees of the Property of Cummins (A Bankrupt) v Cummins (2006) 227 CLR 278 Turner v Trevorrow (1994) 49 FCR 566 Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2017) 258 FCR 190
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate