Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Watt v Shepherd (No 2) [2021] FCA 826 File number(s): NSD 922 of 2019
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 23 July 2021
Catchwords: COMPETITION AND CONSUMER LAW – misleading and deceptive conduct – default judgment under r 5.23 of Federal Court Rules 2011 – unconscionable conduct – accessorial liability – inducement and reliance – unfair tactics – where Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes – Franchising) Regulation 2014 applied – where respondents made multiple misleading and deceptive representations to principal applicant – where respondents intended representations would induce principal applicant to invest and participate in franchising structure and influence other applicants to become franchisees – where representations were as to finance, future matters and profitability of franchise – where respondents lacked reasonable grounds for representations as to future matters – where respondents knew that principal applicant was in a position to influence other proprietors – where respondents knew fees payable by franchisees were not affordable or financially sustainable for franchisees – where respondents failed to make good earlier representations – where respondents failed to prepare or provide franchisees with disclosure documents, or receive from franchisees statement as to independent advice under cl 10 of Code – whether failure to provide documents required by the Code exposed franchisees to situation of vulnerability and disadvantage which was unconscionable conduct – representations made in trade or commerce within meaning of Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and Australian Consumer Law – held: representations were misleading and deceptive (ss 18, 21 of the ACL); representations constituted unfair tactics and unconscionable conduct (ss 22(1)(g) and 22(2)(g) of the ACL); first, second and third respondents accessorially liable; franchise agreements voided; default judgment for damages to be assessed (ss 82, 87 of the CC Act and ss 236, 237 and 243 of the ACL)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate