Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ritson v Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia [2021] FCA 836 Appeal from: Ritson v Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia [2019] FCA 1835
File number(s): NSD 2091 of 2019
Judgment of: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 23 July 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where appellant seeks to appeal a decision made by a Judge of this Court to dismiss as an abuse of process an originating application for judicial review of a decision of a judicial registrar to reject an interlocutory application for filing – where Court finds leave to appeal required – leave to appeal refused
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 31A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26, 26.01(1)(d)
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 655; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2018] FCCA 916 Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (No 3) [2019] FCA 853 Ritson v Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia [2019] FCA 1835
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 24
Date of hearing: 19 July 2021
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent submitted to any order of the court, save as to costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate