Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kayler-Thomson v Colonial First State Investments Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 854 File number: VID 1313 of 2018
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 27 July 2021
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE - application for production of documents for inspection - where respondent resists production on basis of claim to legal professional privilege - where proceedings concern conduct of first respondent as trustee of superannuation funds - where proceedings brought on behalf of members of superannuation funds - whether joint legal professional privilege exists between first applicant and first respondent as beneficiary and trustee - whether joint privilege principles between trustee and beneficiaries confined to small trusts with identifiable beneficiaries with vested interests - whether Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) abrogates joint privilege between trustee and beneficiaries - whether disputed documents relate to management and administration of trust - application dismissed REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS - where first applicant is representative applicant of representative proceedings - where some documents created before first applicant became member of superannuation fund - where first applicant claims some members of class were joint privilege holders - whether first applicant as representative applicant entitled to claim production of discoverable documents on basis of joint privilege of class members
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Part IVA Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: AIT Investment Group Pty Ltd v Markham Property Fund No 2 Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 216 Asirifi-Otchere v Swann Insurance (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1355 Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Avanes v Marshall [2007] NSWSC 191; (2007) 68 NSWLR 595 Benson v Cook [2001] FCA 1684; (2001) 114 FCR 542 Blenkinsop v Herbert [2017] WASCA 87; (2017) 51 WAR 264 Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71 Chan v Valmorbida Custodians Pty Ltd (Ruling) [2020] VSC 590 Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] HCA 53; (2005) 224 CLR 98 Crowe v Stevedoring Employees Retirement Fund Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 316 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49; (2002) 213 CLR 543 Deutsch v Trumble [2016] VSC 263; (2016) 52 VR 108 Dillon v RBS Group (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 896; (2017) 252 FCR 150 Dyczynski v Gibson [2020] FCAFC 120 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Webb (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 Fast v Rockman [2015] VSCA 61 Fay v Moramba Services Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1428 Great Southern Managers Australia Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) v Clarke [2012] VSCA 207; (2012) 36 VR 308 Guest v Guest [2015] VSC 761 Hancock v Rinehart [2013] NSWSC 1402 Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 2140 Hancock v Rinehart [2016] NSWSC 12 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Kennon v Spry; Spry v Kennon [2008] HCA 56; (2008) 238 CLR 366 Krok v Szaintop Homes Pty Ltd (No 1) [2011] VSC 16 McDonald v Ellis [2007] NSWSC 1068; (2007) 72 NSWLR 605 Mercanti v Mercanti [2014] WASC 64 Palmer v Ayres [2017] HCA 5; (2017) 259 CLR 478 Queensland Local Government Superannuation Board v Allen [2016] QCA 325 Re Combined Projects (Arncliffe) Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 649 Re Estate Late Chow Cho-Poon; Application for Judicial Advice [2013] NSWSC 844 Re Gulbenkian's Settlement Trusts; Whishaw v Stephens [1970] AC 508 Re Londonderry's Settlement [1965] Ch 918 Re Simersall; Blackwell v Bray (1992) 35 FCR 584 Re Tillott [1892] 1 Ch 86 Schreuder v Murray (No 2) [2009] WASCA 145; (2009) 41 WAR 169 Schreuders v Grandiflora Nominees Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 310 Shimshon v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd [2020] VSC 640 Silkman v Shakespeare Haney Securities Ltd [2011] NSWSC 148 Spellson v George (1987) 11 NSWLR 300 Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) v Collins [2016] HCA 44; (2016) 259 CLR 212 Watson v Schreuder Partners Lawyers [2020] FCA 1044 Webster (Trustee) v Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co Limited (No 3) [2018] FCA 990 Wigmans v AMP Limited [2021] HCA 7 Wright v Stevens [2018] NSWSC 548
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate