Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 884 File number: NSD 529 of 2020
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 2 August 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to extend time for prospective respondents to comply with preliminary discovery orders made pursuant to r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – application to clarify scope of preliminary discovery orders – whether discovery that has been given is sufficient – whether the prospective respondents' list of documents complies with rr 20.17 and 20.22
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.23, 7.25, 20.17, 20.22
Cases cited: BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v Corelogic Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 382 BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v Corelogic Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1556
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Number of paragraphs: 72
Date of hearing: 20 July 2021
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr J Hennessy SC Mr C McMeniman
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate