Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hillis v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 892 File number: NSD 119 of 2020
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 3 August 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where prerogative relief sought in respect of cancellation of applicant's visa – whether Minister's discretion to cancel visa was a lawful exercise of jurisdiction – whether serious errors made in Minister's reasoning – whether Minister's discretion was unlawful because it was unreasonable – where decision illogical and irrational – where decision based on factual findings not open on the evidence – writs of prohibition and mandamus granted – respondent to pay applicant's costs of the application
Legislation: Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth), ss 21(2)(h), 26(3), 26(3)(a) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 476A, 499, 501, 501(2), 501(6), 501(6)(b) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Australian Constitution, s 75(v)
Cases cited: Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Splendido (2019) 271 FCR 595; [2019] FCAFC 132 BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2020) 274 FCR 532; [2020] FCAFC 54 BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 277 FCR 420; [2020] FCAFC 94 Brett Cattle Company Pty Ltd v Minister for Agriculture (2020) 274 FCR 337; [2020] FCA 732 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 253 FCR 496; [2016] FCAFC 146 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589; [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden (2016) 240 FCR 158; [2016] FCAFC 28 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Haq (2019) 267 FCR 513; [2019] FCAFC 7 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh (2014) 231 FCR 437; [2014] FCAFC 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1; [2016] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZUXN [2016] FCA 516 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99; [2013] FCA 317 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 255 FCR 81; [2017] FCAFC 200 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476; [2003] HCA 2 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 274 FCR 506; [2020] FCAFC 7 SZVAP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 233 FCR 451; [2015] FCA 1089 SZWCO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 51
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate