Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 914 Appeal from: Application for judicial review: Ibrahim and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2020] AATA 3822
File number: NSD 1175 of 2020
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 6 August 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision to refuse to revoke cancellation decision – whether any error in decision of Tribunal to refuse to revoke – where applicant relied on lack of offending since earlier revocation – where applicant had been convicted and sentenced to further imprisonment since earlier revocation – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501CA
Cases cited: F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] AC 295 GBV18 v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 274 FCR 202 Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 279 FCR 611 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa (2021) 95 ALJR 117 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (2015) 256 CLR 326 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services & Multicultural Affairs v CTB19 [2020] FCAFC 166 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125 Viane v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 531 XJLR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 619 Zyambo v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 545
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate