Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Watson v Kriticos (Costs of Summary Judgment Application) [2021] FCA 917 File number: NSD 970 of 2019
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 5 August 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – application for lump sum indemnity costs – application to dispense with Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Costs Forthwith) [2019] FCA 1065 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 801; 46 FCR 225 New Resource Holdings Pty Ltd v Lunt (No 4) [2009] WASC 29 Watson v Kriticos (Summary Judgment) [2021] FCA 261
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Number of paragraphs: 28
Date of last submissions: 30 July 2021
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Campbell
Solicitor for the Applicant: Heathfield Grosvenor Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr D J Ananian-Cooper
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Plastiras Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
ORDERS NSD 970 of 2019
BETWEEN: DALE CAMERON WATSON Applicant
AND: STEPHEN CON KRITICOS First Respondent
WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES LTD Second Respondent
order made by: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 5 August 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate