Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Renton v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 931 File number(s): NSD 1037 of 2020
Judgment of: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 10 August 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Minister under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to revoke the cancellation of the applicant's visa – where the visa was mandatorily cancelled pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Act because the applicant did not pass the character test – where the applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of two child pornography offences and sentenced to a term of imprisonment – whether the Minister made a finding, for which there was no evidence, that the applicant had psychological sexual issues relating to children – whether that finding was legally unreasonable – whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness because the Minister's finding of psychological sexual issues was not obviously open on the material – whether the Minister took into account an irrelevant consideration, being that the applicant received a 25% discount on his sentence in consequence of his guilty pleas – the finding of psychological sexual issues was open on the material and not legally unreasonable – in consequence, no denial of procedural fairness – the matter of a discount on the applicant's sentence was not an irrelevant consideration – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed with costs.
Legislation: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476A(1)(c), s 499, ss 501(3A), (5), (7), s 501CA, s 501CA(4), s 501G(1)(e) Migration Reform (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707; 148 FCR 446 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Federal Broom Co Pty Ltd v Semlitch (1964) 110 CLR 626 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; 267 FCR 628 Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission v May [2016] HCA 19; 257 CLR 468 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; 207 ALR 12 Mount Isa Mines Ltd v Pusey (1970) 125 CLR 383 Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte 2HD Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 45 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; 228 CLR 152 Tame v New South Wales [2002] HCA 35; 211 CLR 317
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate