Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chang v Haughton, in the matter of Haughton (No 2) [2021] FCA 998 File number: SAD 48 of 2021
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application to "dismiss" a sequestration order or alternatively to stay the order – previous application for a stay – consideration of the Court's power to dismiss or stay sequestration orders – belated complaint concerning service of the bankruptcy notice – application dismissed.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 37(2), 43(2), 44(1), 52(3), 58(1), 153B(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 reg 4.02A Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 r 4.02 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 3.11, 5.23, 36.08
Cases cited: Du Bray v ACW [2020] FCA 1142 Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2014] FCA 1139 Haughton v Chang [2020] SADC 94
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 41
Date of hearing: 13 August 2021
Counsel for the Applicants: The Applicants appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent appeared in person
ORDERS SAD 48 of 2021 IN THE MATTER OF PETER SCOTT HAUGHTON BETWEEN: FUI SAK CHANG First Applicant
CHIN SUK KIEW Second Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate