Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
NLHN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1001 Review of: Application for judicial review: NLHN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 502
File number: NSD 343 of 2021
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 24 August 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – cancellation of Class TY, Subclass 444 Special Category (Temporary) visa of New Zealand citizen under s 501(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant failed to pass character test on basis that he has a "substantial criminal record" – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming a decision of the delegate not to revoke cancellation – whether Tribunal failed to adequately consider factors raised by applicant in regard to expectations of Australian community – whether Tribunal formed its own views of expectations of Australian community – FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; (2019) 272 FCR 454 considered – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501(3A), 501(6), 501(6)(a), 501(7)(c), 501CA, 501CA(3), 501CA(4) Direction no. 79 –Visa refusal and cancellation under s501 and revocation of a mandatory cancellation of a visa under s501CA
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; (2019) 272 FCR 454 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 NLHN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 502
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate