Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hillier v Martin (No 6) [2021] FCA 1009 File number: SAD 113 of 2020
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 24 August 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – orders for discovery and production of a document – production order stayed by orders made on an application for leave to appeal – application for leave to appeal subsequently dismissed – whether the order staying the operation of the production order should be revoked – where the respondent party to whom the production order is directed does not oppose the lifting of the stay – where another respondent opposes the lifting of the stay – no proper basis demonstrated for the continuation of the stay
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 198F, 290 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.35, 4.01, 17.01, 20.14, 41.11 Legal Practitioners Act 1981 (SA)
Cases cited: Hillier v Martin [2021] FCA 269 Hillier v Martin (No 2) [2021] FCA 509 Hillier v Martin (No 3) [2021] FCA 709 Hillier v Martin (No 4) [2021] FCA 710 Hillier v Martin (No 5) [2021] FCA 949 Martin v Hillier (No 2) [2021] FCA 958
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 54
Date of hearing: 23 August 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate