Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Melwani v Touch Gold Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1029 File number(s): VID 955 of 2019
Judgment of: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 27 August 2021
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – application for particular discovery – where two previous orders for discovery have been made – where the particular discovery sought coincided with previous orders for discovery – where the respondents' affidavit verifying previous discovery did not comply with r 20.17 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – orders made for the respondents to make, file and serve an affidavit pursuant to r 20.21 with respect to certain categories of documents.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 471B Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.16, 20.17, 20.21, 20.22
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of hearing: 27 August 2021
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr T Rodbard-Bean
Solicitor for the Applicants: Wilkens Roche Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Brnovic
Solicitor for the Respondents: Ravi James Lawyers
ORDERS VID 955 of 2019
BETWEEN: HIROO MELWANI First Applicant
ANITA GOBIND SAMTANI Second Applicant
GOBIND TEJOOMAL SAMTANI Third Applicant
AND: TOUCH GOLD ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 132 116 593) First Respondent
NEW TOUCH ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 146 059 663) Second Respondent
KISHORE GURSAHANI (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate