Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Seven Network v Cricket Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 1032 File number: VID 764 of 2020
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 27 August 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether non-party is entitled to inspect documents pursuant to r 2.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether granting access to restricted documents would do irreparable harm to a party's commercial interests – request for access granted, subject to making of confidentiality order pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.32
Cases cited: Appleroth v Ferrari Australasia Pty Limited [2020] FCA 756 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 4) [2015] FCA 465 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish [1980] FCA 33, 29 ALR 228 Baptist Union v Roberts [2015] FCA 1068; 241 FCR 135 Central Equity Ltd v Chua [1999] FCA 1067 Churche v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (No 3) [2006] FCA 1168 Isaac v Dargan Financial Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 163; 98 NSWLR 343 Mobil Oil Australia Ltd & McDonalds Australia Ltd v Guina Developments Pty Ltd [1996] 2 VR 34 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 193; 257 FCR 62 Strategic Management Australia AFL Pty Ltd v Precision Sports and Entertainment Group Pty Ltd [2015] VSC 717
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate