Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DJC21 v Medical Board of Australia [2021] FCA 1037 File number: NSD 1438 of 2018
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 30 August 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where applicant makes an application for default judgment – whether respondents have defaulted under r 5.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where respondents make an application for summary dismissal – whether applicant has no reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the proceeding – where further assistance required – where amicus curiae appointed
Legislation: Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 5, 6, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 35, 37, 39, 42, 44, 122, 131 Fair Work (Registered Organisation) Act 2009 (Cth) s 20 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.22, 5.23, 8.21, 29.02 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 31A, 37M Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld) Sch 1 Pts 7-8 Health Practitioner Regulation (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2010 (NT) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (WA) Act 2010 (WA) Public Sector Employment and Management Act 1993 (NT) s 64A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate