Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Da Costa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1045 File number: NSD 438 of 2021
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where applicant's visa was cancelled under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant had been convicted of indecent assault and sentenced to more than 12 months' imprisonment – where applicant sought revocation of the cancellation and the Minister personally refused revocation under s 501CA(4) – whether there was "another reason" not to revoke the cancellation of the visa – where applicant's risk of reoffending was assessed as low – whether Minister's intolerance for even low risk of reoffending denied the applicant the possibility of a successful outcome – where applicant has a minor child and a minor stepchild in Australia and is married to an Australian citizen – countervailing factors – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(3A), 501(7)(c), 501CA(4), 501F
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109; 278 FCR 627 EGH19 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 903 EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681; 272 FCR 409 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; 197 CLR 611 Sabado v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 458 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 7; 274 FCR 506 Stewart v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 196 Swannick v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 165; 280 FCR 559
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate