Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
XXBN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1047 Review of: Application for judicial review: XXBN and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2020] AATA 4238
File number: NSD 1259 of 2020
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 1 September 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm a decision to not revoke the cancellation of the applicant's visa pursuant to s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal failed to afford the applicant procedural fairness – whether there was a rational or probative connection between the evidence and the finding that there was a "real possibility" that the applicant would re-partner – whether the Tribunal gave appropriate weight to the best interests of minor children pursuant to Ministerial Direction No 79 – whether the Tribunal failed to have regard to evidence and submissions about the "impact on victims" under Direction No 79 – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 59 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 33(1)(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499, 499(2A), 500(6L), 501, 501(3A), 501(6)(a), 501(7)(c), 501CA
Cases cited: Bale v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 646 CGX20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2020] FCA 1842 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic [1993] FCA 456; 43 FCR 280 Collins v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1981] FCA 162; 36 ALR 598 Consolidated Edison Co v National Labour Relations Board 305 US 197 DBX16 v Minister for Immigration [2021] FCA 238 DKN20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 97 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110; 278 FCR 529 Hodgson v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1141 McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223; 385 ALR 405 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi [1980] FCA 106; 44 FLR 41 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; 95 ALJR 441 Pochi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 33; 36 FLR 482 PQSM v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 125; 279 FCR 175 Re Tarrant and Australian Securities and Investments Decision [2013] AATA 926; 62 AAR 192 Republic of Nauru v WET40 (No 2) [2018] HCA 60; 362 ALR 235 RZSN v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1731 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2014] FCAFC 93; 226 FCR 555 Viane v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 144; 278 FCR 386 WQRJ the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 736
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate