Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
PYDZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1050 Appeal from: PYDZ v Minister for Immigration Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 1138
File number: QUD 163 of 2021
Judgment of: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 2 September 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of decision of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to not revoke delegate's decision under s 501(3A) to cancel visa – whether validity of decision under s 501(3A) affects Tribunal's ability to conduct review under s 501CA(4) – whether the Court has jurisdiction to review s 501(3A) decision under s 476A of the Act or under its accrued or associated jurisdiction – where Tribunal misapplied Direction 90 in considering the expectations of the Australian community – whether error material – whether there was a failure to consider country information – whether applicant was denied procedural fairness by the Tribunal failing to consider claims – whether the Tribunal's decision was legally unreasonable, illogical and irrational – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1901 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: AFX17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 807 Ali v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 278 FCR 627 Applicant S270/2019 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 32 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 253 FCR 496 DDP16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 275 Kelekci v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1000 FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 1990 Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2019) 266 CLR 250 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 500 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 272 FCR 454 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 628 Ibrahim v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 270 FCR 12 KDSP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] HCA 24 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ (2016) 259 CLR 180 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v PWDL [2020] FCA 394 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v FAK19 [2021] FCAFC 153 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 390 ALR 590 Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 457 Re Wakim; Ex Parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 Tang v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 217 FCR 55 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 531 XJLR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 619 Zyambo v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 545
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate