Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nona of behalf of the Badulgal, Mualgal and Kaurareg Peoples (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland [2021] FCA 1059 File number: QUD 9 of 2019
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 1 September 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – timing and location of on-country hearing of lay evidence and mediation in contested native title application – where some parties have experienced difficulties obtaining funding – where public health restrictions affect interstate travel – where delay would affect the management of related matters
Cases cited: Nona on behalf of the Badu People (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland [2020] FCA 983 Nona on behalf of the Badulgal, Mualgal and Kaurareg Peoples (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 1353
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 57
Counsel for the applicant: Ms S Phillips
Solicitor for the applicant: P&E Law
Counsel for the first respondent: Ms N Kidson QC
Solicitor for the first respondent: Crown Law
Counsel for the second respondent: The second respondent did not appear
Counsel for the third to seventh respondents: Mr A McAvoy SC
Solicitor for the third to seventh respondents: Jaramer Legal
Counsel for the intervener: Ms R Webb QC
Solicitor for the intervener: Australian Government Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate