Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ganesh v Dobrowolski (No 2) [2021] FCA 1085 Appeal from: Ganesh v Dobrowolski [2020] FCCA 1013
File number: VID 316 of 2020
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 10 September 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – bankruptcy – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where appeal dismissed – whether any basis to depart from usual order that costs follow the event
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 40.12, 40.14 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016, r 13.01
Cases cited: Lawman v Queensland Building Services Authority (No 2) [2000] FCA 174 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 7
Date of last submissions: 27 August 2021
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant filed submissions on her own behalf
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr MR Champion
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Featherbys Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Kohn
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: DSA Law
ORDERS VID 316 of 2020
BETWEEN: ANANDAVALLI GANESH Appellant
AND: WALTER DOBROWOLSKI First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate