Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DTCB v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1098 Application for judicial review: Application of judicial review of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision delivered on 12 April 2021
File number(s): QUD 156 of 2021
Judgment of: SC DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 10 September 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal ('Tribunal') to affirm decision of a delegate of the Minister to not revoke the cancellation of the Applicant's visa – whether Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error by failing to consider evidence on impact non-revocation of visa cancellation decision would have on stepfather, mother and sister – whether Tribunal failed to adequately consider best interests of minor children – whether Tribunal fell into material illogical reasoning on the way to its conclusion on the extent of impediments that the Applicant faced
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 476A, 499, 501, 501CA Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.52
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 Matthews v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 146 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 390 ALR 590
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate