Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Dallow v Ferguson [2021] FCA 1124 File number: TAD 34 of 2021
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 17 September 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time for leave to appeal under r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the applicant was incarcerated in prison and stated that he faced difficulty in filing the application for leave to appeal – where there is no merit in the applicant's application – application denied
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Allbeury v Corruption and Crime Commission [2012] WASCA 84; 42 WAR 425 Ferguson v Dallow (No 3) [2021] FCA 177 Ferguson v Dallow (No 4) [2021] FCA 513 Ferguson v Dallow (No 5) [2021] FCA 698 Gallagher v Durack [1983] HCA 2; (1983) 152 CLR 238 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 Jones v Toben (No 2) [2009] FCA 477 Kalanje v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1618 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCAFC 111; (2017) 256 FCR 90 Lowndes v the Queen (1999) 195 CLR 655 Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia [2019] FCAFC 234 Mentink v Minister for Home Affairs [2013] FCAFC 113 Parker v R [2002] FCAFC 133 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc [2014] FCAFC 60; (2014) 222 FCR 387 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate