Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tang v Yu [2021] FCA 1126 File number(s): NSD 488 of 2020
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment – where respondents had been in default of multiple orders requiring the filing of a defence and providing discovery – where respondents in continuing default to provide discovery – where respondents gave no adequate explanation for defaults – where respondents self-represented – guillotine order under r 5.21(d) made
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.21, 5.22, 5.23, 20.14, 20.17
Cases cited: Chamberlain Group, Inc v Giant Alarm System Co, Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1606
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of hearing: 16 September 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: B Parker
Solicitor for the Applicant: Domantay Legal Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondents: The respondents appeared in person
ORDERS NSD 488 of 2020
BETWEEN: GUAHUA TANG Applicant
AND: JINYANG YU First Respondent
OLIVER ROTHS Second Respondent
order made by: STEWART J DATE OF ORDER: 16 September 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. By 5:00 pm on 24 September 2021, each respondent file and serve an affidavit deposed to by each of them fulfilling their obligations to give standard discovery in accordance with the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), including listing documents that have been but are no longer in their possession or control and stating who now has possession of them, and also detailing what searches they have made for documents, including on any electronic devices within their control. 2. Pursuant to r 5.21(d) of the Rules, if either respondent is in default of Order 1, the applicant have judgment against that respondent in the sum of $700,000 plus interest from 4 May 2020. 3. Save without leave of the Court, the respondents not be permitted to adduce any evidence, whether by document or witness, at the final hearing. 4. The applicant's evidence-in-chief at the final hearing be given by affidavit to be filed by 29 October 2021. 5. The matter be listed for final hearing on 2 February 2022 with an estimate of two days. 6. The respondents pay the costs of the interlocutory application for default judgment filed on 3 September 2021 on the solicitor and own client scale. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate