Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
MXDK v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1142 Review from: Application for judicial review: MXDK and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] AATA 3762
File number: NSD 1127 of 2020
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 23 September 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – cancellation of Class TY, Subclass 444 Special Category (Temporary) visa of New Zealand citizen under s 503(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant failed to pass character test on the basis that he has a "substantial criminal record" – application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming a decision of the delegate not to revoke cancellation – whether Tribunal failed to consider representations made by applicant – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(3A), 501(3A)(a), s 501(3A)(b), 501(6)(a), 501(7)(c), 501CA, 501CA(3)(b), 501CA(4)(a), 501CA(4)(b), 501CA(4)(b)(ii) Direction no. 79 –Visa refusal and cancellation under s 501 and revocation of a mandatory cancellation of a visa under s 501CA
Cases cited: AWU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 513 AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 32 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 456; (1993) 43 FCR 280 Downes v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 54; (2020) 168 ALD 498 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110; (2020) 278 FCR 529 EVK18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 49; (2020) 274 FCR 598 GBV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 17; (2020) 274 FCR 202 HWLJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1039 McCutcheon v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 828 McLachlan v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 109 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BHA17 [2018] FCAFC 68; (2018) 260 FCR 523 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CPA16 [2019] FCAFC 40; (2019) 268 FCR 37 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198; (2018) 267 FCR 492 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216; (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 MXDK and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] AATA 3762 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 95 ALJR 441 Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 127 PQSM v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1540 RZMW v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1761; (2019) 168 ALD 176 Say v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 84 Swannick v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 165; (2018) 280 FCR 559 SZIFI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCA 63; (2007) 238 ALR 611 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 348; (2016) 248 FCR 296 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate