Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Mainstream Group Holdings Limited, in the matter of Mainstream Group Holdings Limited (Scheme Meeting Orders) [2021] FCA 1163 File number: NSD 271 of 2021
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 24 September 2021
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – members' scheme of arrangement – interlocutory application for orders affecting scheme meeting
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 411, 1319
Cases cited: Mainstream Group Holdings Limited, in the matter of Mainstream Group Holdings Limited (First Scheme Hearing) [2021] FCA 948
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 3
Date of hearing: 24 September 2021
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Dr R P Austin with Mr B J May
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Maddocks Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 271 of 2021 IN THE MATTER OF MAINSTREAM GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED MAINSTREAM GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED Plaintiff
order made by: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 24 SEPTEMBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to sections 411(4)(a)(ii)(A) and 1319 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), Scheme Shareholders lodging direct votes prior to the Scheme Meeting scheduled to be held at 10:30 am (AEST) on 6 October 2021 pursuant to Order 1 of the orders made on 4 August 2021 (Convening Orders) are to be counted as "present" at the Scheme Meeting for the purposes of s 411(4)(a)(ii)(A) of the Act. 2. Pursuant to sections 411(1) and 1319 of the Act, the Plaintiff's compliance with Order 3(a)(ii) of the Convening Orders is sufficient notwithstanding that the proxy forms there referred to were not personalised. 3. Pursuant to sections 411(1) and 1319 of the Act, participation of the Scheme Shareholders at the Scheme Meeting is to be conducted in the manner described in the affidavit of Oliver Bampfield affirmed on 22 September 2021. 4. Order 11 of the Convening Orders is amended by substituting 8 October 2021 for 16 September 2021. 5. The Plaintiff has liberty to apply upon giving 24 hours' notice to ASIC. 6. Pursuant to rule 39.34 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), these orders are entered forthwith. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate