Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Raptis [2021] FCA 1192 File number(s): QUD 310 of 2021
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 1 October 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 7.32, 7.33, 7.34, 7.35, 10.43, 10.44 (1) Freezing Orders Practice Note (GPN-FRZG) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth)s 175
Cases cited: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Allam [2016] HCA 3 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (ACT) v Sharp (1988) 91 FLR 70 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Gashi [2010] VSC 120 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad (2010) 273 ALR 194; [2010] FCA 1014 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Shi [2018] FCA 1915 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2014] FCA 1250 Kukulka v Google LCC [2020] FCA 1299 R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett [1945] HCA 50; (1945) 70 CLR 141 Rumsley v Vegas Enterprises Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 84 Zhen v Mo [2008] VSC 300
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Taxation
Number of paragraphs: 91
Date of hearing: 1 October 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Looney QC and Ms F Chen
Solicitor for the Applicant: K & L Gates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate