Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Rambaldi (Trustee) v Sumpton, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Sumpton [2021] FCA 1199 File number(s): VID 553 of 2021
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 7 October 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders and ancillary orders – where freezing order made in relation to assets overseas – where Respondent has substantial assets in an Indian foreign company – where Respondent failed to disclose these assets to the trustees in bankruptcy in breach of his obligations under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – freezing order granted
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Huang v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2020) 280 FCR 160; [2020] FCAFC 141 Spotlight Pty Ltd v Mehta [2019] FCA 1796
Date of Hearing 30 September 2021
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant Adam Segal
Solicitor for the Applicant McInnes Wilson Lawyers
ORDERS VID 553 of 2021
IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROBERT LAWRENCE SUMPTON BETWEEN: GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI AND INNIS ANTHONY CULL AS TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROBERT LAWRENCE SUMPTON Applicants
AND: ROBERT LAWRENCE SUMPTON Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate