Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Rana v Registrar Cridland (No 2) [2021] FCA 1212 File number: SAD 43 of 2021
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 8 October 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – application for an award of costs by a self-represented litigant – consideration of the discretion to award costs under s 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – application dismissed.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26 Legal Practitioners Act 1981 (SA) s 21
Cases cited: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29; (2019) 93 ALJR 1007 Cachia v Hanes [1994] HCA 14; (1994) 179 CLR 403 Rana v Registrar Cridland [2021] FCA 848 Willing v Hollobone (1972) 3 SASR 532
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of last submission/s: 28 July 2021
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant is self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS SAD 43 of 2021
BETWEEN: RANJIT SHAMSHER JUNG BAHADUR RANA Applicant
AND: MEREDITH CRIDLAND, NATIONAL REGISTRAR OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
order made by: WHITE J DATE OF ORDER: 8 octoBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Applicant's application for costs is refused. 2. There be no order as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate