Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Carna Group Pty Ltd v The Griffin Coal Mining Company (No 6) [2021] FCA 1214 File number: WAD 354 of 2018
Judgment of: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 8 October 2021
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – meaning of 'Insolvent' in commercial contract for the provision of mining services – where the contract prescribes a definition that includes various circumstances where a party will be considered 'Insolvent' – where one part of the definition refers to insolvency as defined by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where another part provides that a party will be 'Insolvent' if it is 'otherwise unable to pay its debts when they fall due' – whether the second part should be read down by reference to the first – whether the second part provides a similar yet independent limb of the definition separate to the insolvency regime in the Corporations Act – whether instead the second part is intended to enshrine the currently legislated definition of insolvency in the event that the Corporations Act is amended or repealed CONTRACTS – breach of contract – whether a party has committed an 'Insolvency Default Breach' by being unable to pay its debts when they fell due – where the relevant events occurred almost seven years ago – where the company continues to trade today and has never been subject to external administration – where the company was reliant on parent company support to pay its debts – whether the company had the necessary degree of assuredness that parent company support would be forthcoming to allow it to pay its debts when they fell due – consideration of whether a company had the 'ability' to pay its debts when they fell due, not whether it actually did so – consideration of the relevance of time periods before and after the date of termination for insolvency DAMAGES – quantum – where the contract provides an exhaustive and specific 'code' for the assessment of a party's entitlement upon termination for breach – whether a party's entitlement under the contractual code precludes the adjustment of that amount by general loss of bargain damages – reasoning in Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] FCA 1354 applied – where damages are calculated solely by reference to the contractual code such that issues of causation and remoteness do not arise for consideration DAMAGES – quantum – whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) should be added to certain amounts payable to the successful party under the contractual code for the calculation of damages – where the amounts payable under the contractual code are directly referrable to amounts due for payment at the date of termination – whether amounts claimed constitute a 'taxable supply' – whether a sufficient nexus exists between the payment and consideration for a supply – consideration of tax ruling GSTR 2001/4 Goods and Services Tax: GST consequences of course orders and out-of-court settlements EVIDENCE – admissibility of business records to prove quantum of damages under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether the exception in s 69(3) of the Evidence Act applies –whether documents were prepared in contemplation of an Australian proceeding
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate