Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1240 Review of: Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 372
File number(s): SAD 49 of 2021
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 14 October 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming the delegate's decision not to revoke a mandatory visa cancellation under s 501(3A) of the Act – whether the Tribunal misapprehended its statutory task – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the impact of non-revocation on the applicant's Australian resident sister – whether the Tribunal failed to give genuine and proper consideration to the human consequences of permanent exclusion from Australia – whether the Tribunal failed to attribute appropriate weight to considerations prescribed by Direction 79 – whether the Tribunal's reliance on expert evidence concerning the applicant's risk of reoffending was legally illogical or irrational – held: application dismissed with costs.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 499, 501, 501CA Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 5, item 5001
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109; (2020) 278 FCR 627 ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Anor [2016] FCAFC 174; (2016) 250 FCR 109 Bettencourt v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 172 EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681; (2019) 272 FCR 409 ETA067 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 46; (2018) 92 ALJR 1003 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Hunt v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 507 Marzano v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 66; (2017) 250 FCR 548 Marzano v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1180 Matthews v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 146 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99; [2013] FCA 317 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17; (1986) 161 CLR 513 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; (2015) 258 CLR 173 QJYD v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 962 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 Suleiman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 594 SZWCO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 51 Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1221; (2014) 226 FCR 154 Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate