Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Rainbow on behalf of the Kurtjar People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2021] FCA 1251 File number(s): QUD 483 of 2015
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 15 October 2021
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE –– application under s 225 of Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for determination of non-exclusive native title over land and waters in disputed portion of claim area – whether continuity of claimant group connection since sovereignty with land and waters of disputed portion by acknowledgement of traditional laws and observance of traditional customs – where uncertainty whether claimant group or other now extinct group(s) in possession of disputed portion at sovereignty – whether claimant group succeeded to or had transmitted native title rights and interests of extinct group(s) – whether extinct and claimant groups part of overarching society at sovereignty that had sufficient common traditional laws and customs – whether necessary to prove actual process or other facts to establish licit succession of incoming claimant group to native title rights and interests of extinct group(s) – whether sufficient spiritual correspondence between traditional laws and customs of extinct and claimant groups, as members of broader overarching society – where experts disagreed on indicia of process of licit succession – where claimant group confident in their connection to country and ability to manage its spiritual dangers – Held: licit succession manifested when incoming group able to deal with spirituality of the country, including actual or postulated spiritual dangers, according to traditional laws and customs – applicant has, by transmission, non-exclusive native title rights and interests over whole claim area. NATIVE TITLE – where applicant claimed right to access natural resources and take, use, share and exchange resources for any purpose – whether expression of right to take resources in determination of native title under s 225 of Act should include limitations on exercise of enjoyment of right provided for in traditional laws and customs, such as requirement not to exploit resources for personal financial gain – Held: appropriate to express non-exclusive right as right to access and take resources in claim area for any purpose.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate