Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Colonial First State Investments Limited [2021] FCA 1268 File number: VID 183 of 2020
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 19 October 2021
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – admitted false or misleading representations in contravention of ss 12DB(1)(h) and (i) of the Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) – application for pecuniary penalties and adverse publicity order – principles relevant to assessment of appropriate penalty – substantial penalty appropriate – adverse publicity order made
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12 DA, 12DB, 12 GBA, 12GLB Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 766B, 912A, 949A, 1041H Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) ss 20B, 29WA Superannuation Legislation Amendment (MySuper Core Provisions) Act 2012 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; 254 FCR 68 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Another [2018] HCA 3; 262 CLR 157 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761; 282 ALR 246 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v SMS Global Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 855; ATPR 42-364 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 629; ATPR 42-402 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Ltd [2016] FCA 44 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wooldridge [2019] FCAFC 172 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 269 ALR 1 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson (No 3) [2017] FCA 1148 Director of Consumer Affairs Victorian v Domain Register Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 2008 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; 166 CLR 59 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134; 71 FCR 285 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; 299 IR 404 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762; [1991] ATPR 41-076 Trade Practices Commission v Stihl Chain Saws (Aust) Pty Ltd [1978] FCA 104; ATPR 40-091 Transport Workers Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 203; 267 FCR 40 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49; 151 ACSR 407
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate