Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Karpik v Carnival plc (The Ruby Princess) (Stay Application Costs) [2021] FCA 1290 File number(s): NSD 806 of 2020
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs of interlocutory application to be payable forthwith – general rule that costs of an interlocutory application should not be taxed until the proceeding is finished – whether any reason to depart from the general rule – application refused
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 567 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International BV (No 5) [2018] FCA 19 The Owners – Strata Plan No 87231 v 3A Composites GmbH (No 2) [2020] FCA 333 Thunderdome Racetiming and Scoring Pty Ltd v Dorian Industries Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 423; 36 FCR 297
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 21 October 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: I Pike SC, R May and D Farinha
Solicitor for the Applicant: Shine Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondents: D McLure SC, G O'Mahoney, A Reid and H Cooper
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clyde & Co
ORDERS NSD 806 of 2020
BETWEEN: SUSAN KARPIK Applicant
AND: CARNIVAL PLC (ARBN 107 998 443 / ABN 23107998443) First Respondent
PRINCESS CRUISE LINES LTD (A COMPANY REGISTERED IN BERMUDA) Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate