Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v A One Multi Services Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1297 File number: QUD 338 of 2021
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 26 October 2021
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – investigation by Australian Securities and Investments Commission – ex parte application for appointment of receivers, asset preservation orders, disclosure orders and travel restriction orders – whether it is necessary or desirable that orders be made – interim orders made
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1323
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd (2003) 44 ACSR 503 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Burke [2000] NSWSC 694 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Krecichwost (2007) 64 ACSR 411 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ludgates Corporate and Investment Advisory Services Pty Ltd (2003) 21 ACLC 1366 Australian Securities Commission v AS Nominees Ltd (1995) 18 ACSR 459 In the matter of Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 467 In the Matter of Trio Capital Limited (in liq) [2012] NSWSC 1595
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 46
Date of hearing: 21 October 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate