Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Leggett v Hawkesbury Race Club Limited (No 1) [2021] FCA 1298 File number(s): NSD 1554 of 2019
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 18 October 2021
Catchwords: ESTOPPEL – issue estoppel – prior adjudication in arbitration in Workers' Compensation Commission – where applicant brought subsequent common law damages claim – whether reasons of arbitrator were admissible in later proceedings to prove issue estoppel – Held: respondent estopped from denying findings of arbitrator – reasons of arbitrator admissible.
Legislation: Workers' Compensation Act 1987 (NSW)
Cases cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Feltham v St Vincent's Hospital (1993) 9 NSWCCR 547 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of hearing: 18 October 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M. Best and Mr G. Fredericks
Solicitor for the Applicant: Gilberts Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr L. King SC and Mr I. Latham
Solicitor for the Respondent: The Workplace – Employment Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1554 of 2019
BETWEEN: VIVIENNE LEGGETT Applicant AND: HAWKESBURY RACE CLUB LIMITED Respondent
order made by: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 18 OCTOBER 2021
THE COURT RULES THAT:
1. The statement of reasons of the arbitrator for the certificate of determination made on 7 December 2017 in the Workers' Compensation Commission at pages 804 to 829 of the court book be admitted into evidence as part of exhibit A. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate