Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Seven Network v Cricket Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1303 File number: VID 764 of 2020
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 26 October 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether non-party is entitled to inspect documents pursuant to r 2.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether confidentiality orders required before granting access to restricted document – confidentiality orders made pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37AF Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.32
Cases cited: Seven Network v Cricket Australia [2021] FCA 1031 Seven Network v Cricket Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 1032
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 8
Date of last submission: 20 September 2021 (Prospective Respondent)
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Atanaskovic Hartnell
Counsel for the Prospective Respondent: Mr A. Dinelli
Solicitor for the Prospective Respondent: K&L Gates
ORDERS VID 764 of 2020
BETWEEN: SEVEN NETWORK Prospective Applicant
AND: CRICKET AUSTRALIA Prospective Respondent
order made by: ANASTASSIOU J DATE OF ORDER: 26 OCTOBER 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate