Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1305 Appeal from: Chen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services & Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 963
File number(s): WAD 126 of 2021
Judgment of: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 27 October 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – decision to cancel appellants' temporary skilled work visas – appeal from Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for judicial review – where appellants' allege primary judge inhibited legal representative from adequately presenting case – where primary judge did not call on respondent's counsel and delivered ex tempore judgment – whether allegation of apprehended bias maintainable – whether oral hearing procedurally unfair – transcript must be read as a whole – held: no apprehended bias or procedural unfairness MIGRATION – whether primary judge misconstrued ss 98 and 99 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – consideration of Gill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 142; 248 FCR 398 and subsequent cases – where appellant expressly disavowed argument that fraud affected delegate or Administrative Appeals Tribunal – held: no appealable error
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 6 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(a), 46, 48, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111 Migration Agents Regulations 1998 (Cth) Sch 2 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) rr 2.41, cl 4020(1) of Sch 4 Criminal Code (WA) s 409
Cases cited: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 AXQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Broder Protection [2016] FCAFC 73 Bryant v United Voice NSW Branch [2019] FCA 460 CDD15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 65; 250 FCR 587 Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29 CMU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 104; 277 FCR 201 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55; 229 CLR 577 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Gill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 142; 248 FCR 398 Katragadda v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 143 Maharjan v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 213; 258 FCR 1 MZAOL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 68 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 141; 247 FCR 554 Zaburoni v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 205; 256 FCR 197
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate